Return-Path: pdulberg@comcast.net Received: from reszmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net (LHLO reszmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.197) by resmail-ch2-706v.sys.comcast.net with LMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.243]) by reszmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 2k4B1q03r5FMDhs01k4GVZ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:04:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.60] ([24.196.107.33]) by resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 2k481q0010jFsy001k4Amx; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:04:14 +0000 X-CAA-SPAM: 00000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=NbFo1gz4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=o5DrY8yc+W6sqIXS0ZwjqA==:117 a=o5DrY8yc+W6sqIXS0ZwjqA==:17 a=C_IRinGWAAAA:8 a=GGcpBh7Jt_oA:10 a=HZJGGiqLAAAA:8 a=jVZ3_pnhqLnY2HrKxKcA:9 a=XAwFi-woCaD8Mcqd:21 a=GwB1mXOe4BgmKZu7:21 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=QNs_r_9RqKIA:10 a=YDcPXCPoowNvaR1BoukA:9 a=kF-IcEKfpyrRI9Fs:21 a=EScz-YyN9Vg7JLfc:21 a=yzDDzQdGWcnb6VT9:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Subject: Fwd: Certified mail References: From: Paul Dulberg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-0913A17D-F424-4DA1-A5DC-8DFCA70E17E8 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12D508) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:04:08 -0500 To: Paul Dulberg Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-0913A17D-F424-4DA1-A5DC-8DFCA70E17E8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Dulberg 847-497-4250 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: > From: Paul Dulberg > Date: March 12, 2015 at 1:47:28 PM CDT > To: Hans Mast > Subject: Re: Certified mail >=20 > I'll see you tomorrow in court room 201 at 9 am. >=20 > Paul Dulberg > 847-497-4250 > Sent from my iPad >=20 >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 12:14 PM, Paul Dulberg wrote: >>=20 >> Hans, >>=20 >> Your cornering of me and my brother in your office, bullying me into sign= ing off on The McGuires policy citing cases that have nothing to do with the= agency clause in the homeowners policy, which clearly makes her policy acco= untable. >> You sir are the one whom told me that I would never see a dime from eithe= r case if I didn't sign that piece of paper before leaving your office that d= ay. You wouldn't even let me sleep on it as I had asked. You said you needed= the $5,000 settlement with the McGuire's insurance to help fund your costs f= or the case with David Gagnon. >>=20 >> Then when the physical therapists tried to demand payment in full you tol= d me and my mother that medical leans against lawsuits often expire before t= he case is resolved saying yes the medical providers can proceed in collecti= ng funds from my assets. Meaning my home. Forcing me into bankruptcy. Then, a= fter filing for bankruptcy, denying you ever said that to both me and mother= and going on to say to us that filing for bankruptcy protection had ruined t= he case. >>=20 >> All that followed up by getting a brief to review from you on the David G= agnon case that was of such a poor understanding of the facts are what lost a= ny hope of respect I had. >>=20 >> I am and have been trying to get you to be professional and earn that res= pect back at every step. >>=20 >> If you had not taken advantage of my ignorance you would not be receiving= this letter nor trying to squirm your way out of representing me today. >>=20 >> As far as your costs and in light of your poor performance to date, it th= rows into question all of the work you have done on this case. Even the depo= sitions you sat in on are in question. Do you actually think anyone in their= right mind wouldn't see it that way. >>=20 >> You may argue strategy as a defense for incompetence but since you sat in= on the medical depositions and don't even know what medications I was and w= asn't prescribed after almost 3-1/2 years on this case I highly doubt anyone= will see your defense as viable. >>=20 >> Exactly, What part of being harmed by both the McGuires and Gagnon throug= h no fault of my own is 9 out of 10 times a losing case? >>=20 >> Exactly what part of you manipulating me into a settlement for only $5000= was seeing to my best interests? >>=20 >> Exactly how is lying in a briefing you were prepared to put before a judg= e is in my best interests? >>=20 >> Exactly how is giving you chance after chance to correct yourself not giv= ing you the respect you think you deserve from me? >>=20 >> I can keep going... >> I have witnesses to all of this. It's not just your word vs mine. >>=20 >> Bottom line is if you want out simply because you feel I have no respect f= or you then all of your fees are subject and any lean you have is subject. >>=20 >> I'm giving you the opportunity to remedy this coarse of action you have c= hosen. >>=20 >> Do you chose to be professional and do the job your capable of or do you c= hose to remove yourself for some made up reason. Our emails alone show there= is no breakdown in communication. We are still communicating. This email pr= oves that.=20 >>=20 >> So, unless you can explain your action to remove yourself from this case f= or some excusable reason I see no reason why you feel your entitled to being= able to get excused from it at all.=20 >>=20 >> I put you to task to do as you agreed to and represent me to whatever end= s this case comes to. Will you be professional and finish what you started? >>=20 >> Damn these emails hurt to type...=20 >>=20 >> Wish you had it in you to go after the bad guy who did this and not your i= nnocent client. >>=20 >> Paul >>=20 >> Paul Dulberg >> 847-497-4250 >> Sent from my iPad >>=20 >>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Hans Mast wrote: >>>=20 >>> I have done nothing to lose your respect. I have gone far above what you= would get from any other attorney you just don't realize it or appreciate i= t. Instead you continue to focus on issues that have nothing to do with your= case. You don't listen to my advice. Which is fine. You don't have to liste= n to my advice. But 9 out of 10 times you will lose this case for trial. As I= told you before that is why the defense is never going to offer the policy l= imits. To settle the case you will need to take far less than the limits. Bu= t you don't have to you definitely can go to trial. That is your personal ch= oice. In my view your case is not worth the limits given the issues we've al= ready discussed. So I have done what I can do for you.=20 >>>=20 >>> We have I think $3000 in costs that we will be paid no matter who is han= dling Case. We have worked on the case for years without pay....but if it wi= ll allow you to find another attorney we will consider waiving Our fee unles= s your eventual recovery exceeds $100,000. >>>=20 >>> Sent from my iPhone >>>=20 >>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:19 AM, Paul Dulberg wrote= : >>>>=20 >>>> Hans, >>>> I have found several attorneys and none are willing to represent me as l= ong as you hold the lean on this case and apparently it is not legal for me t= o finance their representation by other means. >>>>=20 >>>> Respect for your thoughts does not constitute a breakdown in communicat= ions. >>>>=20 >>>> Respect is earned through truth, hard work and results. >>>>=20 >>>> I am asking for an honest brief to go before the judge. That is all. >>>>=20 >>>> Earn my respect and you will receive the best recommendation I have eve= r given anyone. >>>>=20 >>>> Paul >>>>=20 >>>> Paul Dulberg >>>> 847-497-4250 >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>=20 >>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Hans Mast wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Paul I will be happy to deal with any attorney considering your case d= irectly regarding my lien. But not until they call me to talk. As is clear w= ith your email and many others you do not respect my thoughts and/or knowled= ge about these cases and there is no point in continuing any further in deal= ing with an unsatisfied client. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Find an attorney and I will talk to them about the lien. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Paul Dulberg wrot= e: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Received your certified mail requesting to be released from my case d= ue to a breakdown in communication between you and I. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I ask that you not follow through with this action unless you are wil= ling to also sign off on your lean against my case. As I have no chance in h= ell of getting another attorney willing to take this case on without your le= an being freed from this case.=20 >>>>>> Bottom line... No attorney I have spoken with is willing to trust tha= t you will pay them from your lean. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Please withdraw your motion as there has been no breakdowns in commun= ications between you and I.=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> The only breakdown was a very poorly written brief you asked me to lo= ok over in which the only truthful substance in it was the names and dates. O= h and the fact that you did manage to put the chainsaw in the correct person= s hands. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I hope to be able to review your revised copy of this brief again soo= n. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Best wishes and Thank you, >>>>>> Paul >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I ask that if=20 >>>>>> Paul Dulberg >>>>>> 847-497-4250 >>>>>> Sent from my iPad --Apple-Mail-0913A17D-F424-4DA1-A5DC-8DFCA70E17E8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Paul Dulberg
847-497-4250<= br>
Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:=

From: Paul Dulberg <<= a href=3D"mailto:pdulberg@comcast.net">pdulberg@comcast.net>
Da= te: March 12, 2015 at 1:47:28 PM CDT
To: Hans Mast <hansmast@att.net>
Subject: = Re: Certified mail

<= div>I'll see you tomorrow in court room 201 at 9 am.
<= /span>
Paul Dulberg
847-497-4250
Se= nt from my iPad

O= n Mar 12, 2015, at 12:14 PM, Paul Dulberg <pdulberg@comcast.net> wrote:

<= span>Hans,
Your cornering of me and my br= other in your office, bullying me into signing off on The McGuires policy ci= ting cases that have nothing to do with the agency clause in the homeowners p= olicy, which clearly makes her policy accountable.
You sir are the one whom told me that I would n= ever see a dime from either case if I didn't sign that piece of paper before= leaving your office that day. You wouldn't even let me sleep on it as I had= asked. You said you needed the $5,000 settlement with the McGuire's insuran= ce to help fund your costs for the case with David Gagnon.

Then when the physical therapists tried to demand payment i= n full you told me and my mother that medical leans against lawsuits often e= xpire before the case is resolved saying yes the medical providers can proce= ed in collecting funds from my assets. Meaning my home. Forcing me into bank= ruptcy. Then, after filing for bankruptcy, denying you ever said that to bot= h me and mother and going on to say to us that filing for bankruptcy protect= ion had ruined the case.

All that followe= d up by getting a brief to review from you on the David Gagnon case that was= of such a poor understanding of the facts are what lost any hope of respect= I had.

I am and have been trying to get y= ou to be professional and earn that respect back at every step.

If you had not taken advantage of my ignorance you wo= uld not be receiving this letter nor trying to squirm your way out of repres= enting me today.

As far as your costs and= in light of your poor performance to date, it throws into question all of t= he work you have done on this case. Even the depositions you sat in on are i= n question. Do you actually think anyone in their right mind wouldn't see it= that way.
You may argue strategy as a de= fense for incompetence but since you sat in on the medical depositions and d= on't even know what medications I was and wasn't prescribed after almost 3-1= /2 years on this case I highly doubt anyone will see your defense as viable.=

Exactly, What part of being harmed by bo= th the McGuires and Gagnon through no fault of my own is 9 out of 10 times a= losing case?
=
Exactly what part of you ma= nipulating me into a settlement for only $5000 was seeing to my best interes= ts?

Exactly how is lying in a briefing yo= u were prepared to put before a judge is in my best interests?

Exactly how is giving you chance after chance to corre= ct yourself not giving you the respect you think you deserve from me?=

I can keep going...
I have witnesses to all of this. It's not just y= our word vs mine.

Bottom line is if you w= ant out simply because you feel I have no respect for you then all of your f= ees are subject and any lean you have is subject.

I'm giving you the opportunity to remedy this coarse of action you h= ave chosen.
Do you chose to be profession= al and do the job your capable of or do you chose to remove yourself for som= e made up reason. Our emails alone show there is no breakdown in communicati= on. We are still communicating. This email proves that.

So, unless you can explain your action to remove yourself fr= om this case for some excusable reason I see no reason why you feel your ent= itled to being able to get excused from it at all.
<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
I put you to task to do as you agreed to and represent me to what= ever ends this case comes to. Will you be professional and finish what you s= tarted?

Damn these emails hurt to type...=

Wish you had it in you to go after the b= ad guy who did this and not your innocent client.

Paul
=
Paul Dulberg
847-497-4250
Sent from my iPad

On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Hans Mast &= lt;hansmast@att.net> wrote:

=
I have done nothing to lose your respect. I h= ave gone far above what you would get from any other attorney you just don't= realize it or appreciate it. Instead you continue to focus on issues that h= ave nothing to do with your case. You don't listen to my advice. Which is fi= ne. You don't have to listen to my advice. But 9 out of 10 times you will lo= se this case for trial. As I told you before that is why the defense is neve= r going to offer the policy limits. To settle the case you will need to take= far less than the limits. But you don't have to you definitely can go to tr= ial. That is your personal choice. In my view your case is not worth the lim= its given the issues we've already discussed. So I have done what I can do f= or you.

We have I think $3000 in costs t= hat we will be paid no matter who is handling Case. We have worked on the ca= se for years without pay....but if it will allow you to find another attorne= y we will consider waiving Our fee unless your eventual recovery exceeds $10= 0,000.

Sent from my iPhone
=
On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:19= AM, Paul Dulberg <pdulberg@comca= st.net> wrote:

Hans,
I have found several attorne= ys and none are willing to represent me as long as you hold the lean on this= case and apparently it is not legal for me to finance their representation b= y other means.

Respect for your though= ts does not constitute a breakdown in communications.

Respect is earned through truth, hard work and results.

I am asking for an honest brief to go be= fore the judge. That is all.

Earn my r= espect and you will receive the best recommendation I have ever given anyone= .

Paul

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
Paul Dulberg
847-497-4250
Sent f= rom my iPad
=
On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Hans Mast <hansmast@att.net> wrote:
<= blockquote type=3D"cite">

Paul I will be happy to deal with any attorney considering your case direc= tly regarding my lien. But not until they call me to talk. As is clear with y= our email and many others you do not respect my thoughts and/or knowledge ab= out these cases and there is no point in continuing any further in dealing w= ith an unsatisfied client.
=

Find an a= ttorney and I will talk to them about the lien.
<= br>
Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 12, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Paul Dulberg <pdulberg@comcast.net> wrote:=

Hi Hans,

Received your certified mail requesting to be released from my c= ase due to a breakdown in communication between you and I.

=
I ask that you not follow through with this action un= less you are willing to also sign off on your lean against my case. As I hav= e no chance in hell of getting another attorney willing to take this case on= without your lean being freed from this case.
<= blockquote type=3D"cite">Bottom line... No attorney I have spoken with= is willing to trust that you will pay them from your lean.

=
Please withdraw your motion as there has been no brea= kdowns in communications between you and I.

The only breakdown was a very poorly written brief you asked me t= o look over in which the only truthful substance in it was the names and dat= es. Oh and the fact that you did manage to put the chainsaw in the correct p= ersons hands.
=

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
I hope to be able t= o review your revised copy of this brief again soon.
=

Best wishes and Thank you,
Paul

=
I a= sk that if
Paul D= ulberg
847-497-425= 0
Sent from my iP= ad
= --Apple-Mail-0913A17D-F424-4DA1-A5DC-8DFCA70E17E8--